Get your AI app reviewed, with ongoing technical oversight instead of a one-off gut check
AI ships apps in days, but is the result actually production ready? Veriploy reviews the repo, security, CVEs and infrastructure of your AI app and keeps it under ongoing technical oversight afterwards, instead of stopping at a one-off report.
- Snapshot from 249 €
- Fixed monthly plans
- Repo + CVE + infrastructure
- German point of contact
Technical point of contact
Timo Wevelsiep
Software engineer, cloud architect, founder & managing director
I review code, security and infrastructure and surface what is technically risky before launch, customer use or due diligence.
For questions like:
- Is this release ready for production?
- Which CVEs are really critical?
- Will the architecture carry the next users?
What Veriploy reviews
We look at the points that decide production readiness and rank every finding by severity. We review:
Repo and architecture: structure, dependencies, obvious weak spots
Security and access control: auth, roles, exposed secrets
CVEs and dependencies: known vulnerabilities in the packages you use
Database and RLS: tenant isolation, policies, access protection
Infrastructure, deployment, backups and monitoring
Production readiness: what is still missing before real users
Common risks in AI-built code
AI tools produce working code fast, but they rarely make the security and operations decisions that real production needs. These are the gaps we find most often:
- Critical
Authentication without a roles and permissions model
- Critical
Supabase RLS not enabled or incomplete
- Critical
Secrets and API keys in the frontend or in the repository
- High
Unchecked dependencies with known CVEs
- High
Missing or shallow tests
- High
Deployment without a backup and recovery plan
- Medium
No monitoring and no logging when things break
- Medium
Missing rate limiting on open endpoints
Which AI tools it works for
Whatever AI tool built the app, we review the repository, not the vendor.
Classic code reviews deliver a thorough one-off assessment with an action plan. That is a sensible starting point. Veriploy picks up right after: you get an AI-generated app reviewed once (Snapshot or Baseline) and then keep it under ongoing technical oversight with Watch, Guard or Launch.
Stacks we see every day
- Lovable
- Cursor
- Claude Code
- Bolt
- Replit
- v0
- GitHub Copilot
One review is not enough: ongoing oversight
A one-off report describes yesterday's state. AI-built code drifts fast: every new feature adds new dependencies, new CVEs surface every week, and every prompt shifts the architecture a little. An action plan that is four weeks old no longer covers that movement.
Snapshot, Baseline or ongoing plan
- 01
Snapshot 249 €
Automated scan plus a short manual look at 1 repo. Result: the 5 most important risks and a 1-page risk dashboard. Best for a first assessment on a small budget.
- 02
Baseline 490 €
Deep initial baseline: repo, architecture, dependencies, config. Result: risk dashboard, CVE baseline, secrets check and a plan recommendation. A clean starting point before any plan.
- 03
Plan from 299 €/mo
Recurring reviews based on the baseline with recurring reports and fix prioritisation. Async sparring and a direct channel by plan. Best for products that keep evolving.
What a finding looks like
Supabase RLS for the invoices table is incomplete, users could see other tenants' invoices. Recommendation: enforce a policy per user_id.
One-off report or ongoing oversight?
Timing
- One-off report
- Point-in-time snapshot on a fixed date
- Veriploy ongoing
- Continuous, with every new change
CVEs and dependencies
- One-off report
- State on the review day
- Veriploy ongoing
- Ongoing monitoring with alerts
New features
- One-off report
- Not covered
- Veriploy ongoing
- Risky changes are flagged early
Before a release
- One-off report
- Another review needed
- Veriploy ongoing
- Human judgement included in the plan
Assessment
- One-off report
- Action plan at the end
- Veriploy ongoing
- Human prioritisation, not just a score
- 249 €Snapshot, one-off
- 490 €Baseline, one-off
- from 299 €Plan per month
- read-onlyRepo access
Frequently asked questions
Is this a penetration test?
No. Veriploy is an ongoing technical review of repo, security, CVEs and infrastructure, not a classic pentest. A pentest can complement it well when you want to simulate targeted attacks. We continuously check whether your code and infrastructure are production ready.
Do you also do the fixes?
Not within the plan. We review, prioritise and explain what needs to be done. Implementation runs separately through Wevelsiep Advisory or WZ-IT, or your own team. That keeps the review independent from the implementation.
Do you need repo access?
Yes, read-only by default. Read access to the repository is enough for the review. We do not need write access, because we do not commit the fixes ourselves.
Which tools do you cover?
We review the result, not the tool. Code from Lovable, Cursor, Claude Code, Bolt, Replit, v0 or GitHub Copilot can be reviewed just like hand-written code. What matters is the repository, not the generator.
What does it cost?
The entry point is fixed: Snapshot 249 € and Baseline 490 € as one-off reviews. Ongoing oversight starts at 299 € per month (Watch), then Guard at 749 € and Launch at 1.490 € per month. All prices are net plus VAT, plans cancellable monthly.
How fast do I get results?
We usually deliver the Snapshot within a few business days. The Baseline takes a little longer because it goes deeper. On an ongoing plan you get regular reports and a prompt heads-up on critical CVEs.
Get your AI app reviewed and keep it monitored afterwards.
Start with Snapshot or Baseline, then ongoing oversight in the plan that fits.